ATP Masters 1000: Monte Carlo

Tenez wrote:Djoko is not like Nadal but a kind of Hewitt. The 3 of them kill the spirit of the sport. Tennis should be a "shot maker" sport.

I know

Tenez wrote:Djoko is not like Nadal but a kind of Hewitt. The 3 of them kill the spirit of the sport. Tennis should be a "shot maker" sport.

Zzz stop moaning the same thing again and again and get over it

Some people prefer watching Nadal play to Federer/ Llodra.

Kim Jong-Un wrote:

Tenez wrote:Djoko is not like Nadal but a kind of Hewitt. The 3 of them kill the spirit of the sport. Tennis should be a "shot maker" sport.

Zzz stop moaning the same thing again and again and get over it

Some people prefer watching Nadal play to Federer/ Llodra.

Oh I thought Nadal was a shot maker....now if even yourself admit he isn't then we agree on something.

Tenez wrote:

Kim Jong-Un wrote:

Tenez wrote:Djoko is not like Nadal but a kind of Hewitt. The 3 of them kill the spirit of the sport. Tennis should be a "shot maker" sport.

Zzz stop moaning the same thing again and again and get over it

Some people prefer watching Nadal play to Federer/ Llodra.

Oh I thought Nadal was a shot maker....now if even yourself admit he isn't then we agree on something.

??

Tenez wrote:

Kim Jong-Un wrote:

Tenez wrote:Djoko is not like Nadal but a kind of Hewitt. The 3 of them kill the spirit of the sport. Tennis should be a "shot maker" sport.

Zzz stop moaning the same thing again and again and get over it

Some people prefer watching Nadal play to Federer/ Llodra.

Oh I thought Nadal was a shot maker....now if even yourself admit he isn't then we agree on something.

Well said indeed! Somehow Kim won't get it...

sphairistike wrote:
Well said indeed! Somehow Kim won't get it...

Why do you care if someone else enjoys watching Nadal play ?
Must we all agree with you on who's entertaining to watch or not ? Bizarre attitude to have.

Kim Jong-Un wrote:

sphairistike wrote:
Well said indeed! Somehow Kim won't get it...

Why do you care if someone else enjoys watching Nadal play ?
Must we all agree with you on who's entertaining to watch or not ? Bizarre attitude to have.

You still don't get it, do you? What Tenez is saying is that you finally acknowledged Nadal is not a ball striker as you used him as an antithetic to Federer as a ball striker...

sphairistike wrote:What Tenez is saying is that you finally acknowledged Nadal is not a ball striker as you used him as an antithetic to Federer as a ball striker...

No I didn't, what on earth are you on about ?

Federer and Lllodra are more attacking players, while Nadal has a more defensive style. My point was that different people have different tastes, and can be entertained by baseline tennis with rallies, or more quick tennis where the point is over rapidly with attacking play etc.

Relax Kim, Relax! We don;t want you to feel cornered here...though we know you will never admit it even when you are cornered.

Different people have different tastes, if I see someone else finds a player I don't rate that much as very entertaining, I wouldn't keep on moaning about it.

We understand that. But some styles require more talent than others while others require more fitness.

The problem is you fail to see why you like Nadal. You try to make us believe he is a shot maker and talented when his strength is essentially his power and stamina.

That is clearly where there is a flaw in your arguments. If you were saying "I like Nadal because of his "chocolate eyes", then I understand. Fair enough...but to make us believe that Nadal is a shot maker when clearly he is a brute using ridiculous high margins, is comical.

Tenez wrote:
The problem is you fail to see why you like Nadal.

Absolutely not; I like him because I find him very entertaining to watch, and like his spirit.