Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» ATP Masters 1000: Cincinnati
Yesterday at 10:48 pm by Jahu

» 10 Years Ago...
Yesterday at 9:16 pm by Tenez

» How strong is Nadal mentally?
Sat Aug 19, 2017 8:54 pm by Tenez

» US OPEN 2017
Sat Aug 19, 2017 3:38 pm by Daniel

» Sharapova announces failed drug test
Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:53 pm by Jahu

» Will Federer and Nadal Finally Meet At The US Open?
Wed Aug 16, 2017 7:45 am by Daniel

» Canadian Masters 1000
Tue Aug 15, 2017 8:27 am by legendkillar

» Another record for Federer coming up?
Mon Aug 14, 2017 9:46 pm by Daniel

» The doping program joke of the ITF!!!
Mon Aug 14, 2017 2:51 pm by legendkillar

August 2017
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Calendar Calendar

Affiliates
free forum


Fight for #1

Page 3 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by bogbrush on Wed Jul 19, 2017 2:46 pm

Nah, Federer won't grind, he'll either fly or crash.

Five sets of Fed2017 tennis isn't that arduous. It's probably easier than three sets of what he was doing in 2008. 

This more than anything was why he managed to finish the AO final playing well after what on paper looks like a marathon tournament. Sure he was tired but he was still functioning at a high level - high enough to take 5 straight games off Nadal! Don't forget he also outlasted Stan.

bogbrush

Posts : 934
Join date : 2015-03-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by ... on Wed Jul 19, 2017 2:55 pm

bogbrush wrote:Nah, Federer won't grind, he'll either fly or crash.

Five sets of Fed2017 tennis isn't that arduous. It's probably easier than three sets of what he was doing in 2008. 

This more than anything was why he managed to finish the AO final playing well after what on paper looks like a marathon tournament. Sure he was tired but he was still functioning at a high level - high enough to take 5 straight games off Nadal! Don't forget he also outlasted Stan.

I disagree and think the opposite.

It's very draining to fly, however easy it may look.

To continually time all shots incl the bh requires perfect focus and footwork.

But in a way it's maybe less stressful compared to the grinders as playing instincitve tennis is like having wind in your back...though being at the net and hitting 2-3 volleys is super draining.

Adrenaline....

...

Posts : 24529
Join date : 2012-06-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by bogbrush on Wed Jul 19, 2017 2:59 pm

What? 1 - 4 shot rallies? Matches done in 90 minutes?  Returns hit over the backhand that close the rally quickly?

He doesn't hit 2 or 3 volleys at the net, it's usually 1. Nothing to do with adrenaline. Everything to do with taking time away from the opponent and running less.

bogbrush

Posts : 934
Join date : 2015-03-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by ... on Wed Jul 19, 2017 3:04 pm

I find volleying (real ones not the putaways) thrilling and very draining.
It doesn't get crazier than hitting a volley, you deal with fastest balls in the air.

It's tough to do in current conditions...if it wasn't, everyone would be doing it.

...

Posts : 24529
Join date : 2012-06-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by Slippy on Wed Jul 19, 2017 3:08 pm

Hitting 2-3 volleys is not draining at all. The reason the top guys don't volley is because it is never a focus for juniors - since the 90s it's all been about baseline hitting.  Given that, these guys aren't going to start getting to the top and turning into Edberg. They stick with what they know.

Slippy

Posts : 178
Join date : 2016-10-23

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by bogbrush on Wed Jul 19, 2017 3:09 pm

That's probably because, like most amateurs, you're not that good at it and it involves throwing no yourself around. I was similar!

There's no way what Fed does now burns anything like the calories per match he used to, not even close. 

His recent interview was to tell the young kids to get to it, that they can do it they just need to train the style and shots in.

bogbrush

Posts : 934
Join date : 2015-03-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by ... on Wed Jul 19, 2017 3:13 pm

I don't throw myself around.

It's about taming the ball in the least possible time.

Compare hitting the ball at the net and 4m behind the baseline like Nadal.

...

Posts : 24529
Join date : 2012-06-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by bogbrush on Wed Jul 19, 2017 3:15 pm

... wrote:I don't throw myself around.

It's about taming the ball in the least possible time.

Compare hitting the ball at the net and 4m behind the baseline like Nadal.
Yeah, net play is easy.

No big backswing, guaranteed short rally, use opponents pace, little or no running.

bogbrush

Posts : 934
Join date : 2015-03-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by ... on Wed Jul 19, 2017 3:21 pm

It may be easy in your club, but it's not that easy with players like Nadal or Murray able to pass you almost at will.

The pressure he plays with is not the same as our jolly in the club.

One or two wrong adventures at the net and you can kiss the match goodbye.

...

Posts : 24529
Join date : 2012-06-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by bogbrush on Wed Jul 19, 2017 3:32 pm

So you ignore the fact that almost all the most incredibly fit guys have always been baseliners while some successful volleyers can be well below that? McEnroe couldn't run with Lendl but he could volley him out of a match.

Seriously nitb, you're onto a massive loser here if you're going to hang on to this idea that primarily baseline play is less energetic than primarily volleying.

bogbrush

Posts : 934
Join date : 2015-03-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by ... on Wed Jul 19, 2017 4:19 pm

My point was (before you started telling us what a great s&v-er you are) that Fed's 5 setter IS arduous and very draining.

...

Posts : 24529
Join date : 2012-06-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by ... on Wed Jul 19, 2017 4:26 pm

What do you all think of this special white "8" racquet
Fed got from Wilson?

A lot of symbolism in it:


...

Posts : 24529
Join date : 2012-06-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by bogbrush on Wed Jul 19, 2017 4:43 pm

... wrote:My point was (before you started telling us what a great s&v-er you are) that Fed's 5 setter IS arduous and very draining.
I was a crap s & ver. a baseline king with a very big serve and a crunching SHBH. I was also the fittest guy in the club and could run the legs off anyone. I beat better players than me partly by running them to death (though I was no tactical RRunner, my biggest weakness was too many unforced errors because I loved hitting killer backhands from anywhere. I was Dolgopolov not Murray, with a similar success!

No, Fed2017 5 setters are bearable though it depends against whom. I wouldn't recommend he goes long against Murray, Djokovic or Nadal in sequence.

bogbrush

Posts : 934
Join date : 2015-03-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by bogbrush on Wed Jul 19, 2017 4:44 pm

Nice racquet. Just please no more suits.

The cardigan was ok, I liked that.

bogbrush

Posts : 934
Join date : 2015-03-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by ... on Wed Jul 19, 2017 9:35 pm

Slippy wrote:Hitting 2-3 volleys is not draining at all. The reason the top guys don't volley is because it is never a focus for juniors - since the 90s it's all been about baseline hitting.  Given that, these guys aren't going to start getting to the top and turning into Edberg. They stick with what they know.
There is truth in that, coaches do focus on groundstrokes mostly these days, amd teach DBH.
Slow conditions are partly to blame,

I am not crazy about exclusive S&V a la Sampras, but an all court game like Federer or Simon.

...

Posts : 24529
Join date : 2012-06-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by Tenez on Wed Jul 19, 2017 9:42 pm

Serve Volleying is extremely exhaustive as it is a very short burst but intense energy to bring the body from teh baseline to the net. many say Squash or Badmington are the most exhausting sports.

Just watch any clip from McEnroe from instance BB and you will see the time he takes to recover between points.

whether it is more exhausting than a baseliner I am not sure. I'd think that a 400m and 10k runners have given everything they have at the end of their respective race.

Tenez

Posts : 16636
Join date : 2012-06-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by bogbrush on Wed Jul 19, 2017 10:03 pm

McEnroe was never a highly conditioned player even for his time.

In any case, we're really examining Federers game which isn't serve volley. He plays a game to shorten rallies and use net play to pressurise others and close out points.

bogbrush

Posts : 934
Join date : 2015-03-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by summerblues on Thu Jul 20, 2017 2:12 am

... wrote:I am not crazy about exclusive S&V a la Sampras, but an all court game like Federer or Simon.
Sampras was not exclusively S&V outside Wimbledon. McEnroe was S&V. I loved it.

summerblues

Posts : 2863
Join date : 2012-05-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by summerblues on Thu Jul 20, 2017 2:14 am

Baseline game is far more draining than S&V.  That is why most of the old players who are still high in the rankings are S&Vers, or at least attacking players.  Muller just reached his career high ranking at 34.

summerblues

Posts : 2863
Join date : 2012-05-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by bogbrush on Thu Jul 20, 2017 2:22 am

Thanks, thought I was going mad.

bogbrush

Posts : 934
Join date : 2015-03-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by DECIMA on Thu Jul 20, 2017 4:47 am

bogbrush wrote:

In any case, we're really examining Federers game which isn't serve volley. He plays a game to shorten rallies and use net play to pressurise others and close out points.
Yep, you're right.
Not just going to the net when opponent is on the back foot (S&V from time to time), but also taking the returns on more to force the issue. It hasn't just helped Federer save energy, but meant he's harder to dominate and dictate.

DECIMA

Posts : 4241
Join date : 2013-05-03

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by Tenez on Thu Jul 20, 2017 9:35 pm

Federer is on the race!


Tenez

Posts : 16636
Join date : 2012-06-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by ... on Thu Jul 20, 2017 10:51 pm

Nothint too revealing there except when he talks about 3, MAYBE 4 guys who will be in the race.
He mentions Nadal and Murray, so even he doesn't know the state of Nole's injury, and Murray's one seems not to be that serious obviously.
Interesting.

...

Posts : 24529
Join date : 2012-06-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by bogbrush on Fri Jul 21, 2017 12:57 am

"It would mean a lot to me"

I like!

bogbrush

Posts : 934
Join date : 2015-03-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by summerblues on Fri Jul 21, 2017 2:04 am

He should not even think about until after the USO. After the USO, take stock of where things are and decide then.

summerblues

Posts : 2863
Join date : 2012-05-19

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by bogbrush on Sun Aug 13, 2017 12:13 am

Just 40 points behind in the race now, with the final to come tomorrow.

bogbrush

Posts : 934
Join date : 2015-03-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by Tenez on Sun Aug 13, 2017 7:58 am

I think it is going to be a very close race as Nadal also wants it desperately and he is fitter.

Federer will need help from the others. As it stands in fact only Zverev can save federer as he is the only who can beat Nadal atm.

Tenez

Posts : 16636
Join date : 2012-06-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by legendkillar on Sun Aug 13, 2017 9:17 am

Nadals form has been some what indifferent. I think we are in danger in really heightening his chances.

Think if Federer holds the course, he'll get it again.

legendkillar

Posts : 1818
Join date : 2012-10-02

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by bogbrush on Sun Aug 13, 2017 12:12 pm

Tenez wrote:I think it is going to be a very close race as Nadal also wants it desperately and he is fitter.

Federer will need help from the others. As it stands in fact only Zverev can save federer as he is the only who can beat Nadal atm.
Zverev, is that the left handed blonde lad with the Hewitt cap?

bogbrush

Posts : 934
Join date : 2015-03-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by Slippy on Sun Aug 13, 2017 12:15 pm

bogbrush wrote:
Tenez wrote:I think it is going to be a very close race as Nadal also wants it desperately and he is fitter.

Federer will need help from the others. As it stands in fact only Zverev can save federer as he is the only who can beat Nadal atm.
Zverev, is that the left handed blonde lad with the Hewitt cap?
Or the ageing left hander with a huge serve? A man of many faces this Zverev!

Slippy

Posts : 178
Join date : 2016-10-23

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by bogbrush on Sun Aug 13, 2017 12:37 pm

Must be a Time Lord. We've had #1 played by Alexander, # 2 by Mischa, #3 by Sacha, #4 by Muller and now #5 by Shapavalov.

bogbrush

Posts : 934
Join date : 2015-03-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by ... on Sun Aug 13, 2017 1:06 pm

bogbrush wrote:Must be a Time Lord. We've had #1 played by Alexander, # 2 by Mischa, #3 by Sacha, #4 by Muller and now #5 by Shapavalov.

???

...

Posts : 24529
Join date : 2012-06-18

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by bogbrush on Sun Aug 13, 2017 2:53 pm

... wrote:
bogbrush wrote:Must be a Time Lord. We've had #1 played by Alexander, # 2 by Mischa, #3 by Sacha, #4 by Muller and now #5 by Shapavalov.

???
Never heard of Doctor Who?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_Lord

bogbrush

Posts : 934
Join date : 2015-03-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by Daniel on Sun Aug 13, 2017 4:57 pm

It's going to come down to Cinc and the tournaments after anyway - and Nadal is unlikely to go too far there.  If Fed reaches the final at Cinc but loses v Zverev today, he'll be 5 short of Murray.

Daniel

Posts : 2854
Join date : 2013-11-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by luvsports! on Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:08 pm

Murray loses 600 though Daniel.

luvsports!

Posts : 3932
Join date : 2012-09-28

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by bogbrush on Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:17 pm

Yeah, Murray loses it after Cincy even Federer & Nadal skipped it.

bogbrush

Posts : 934
Join date : 2015-03-30

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by Daniel on Sun Aug 13, 2017 5:26 pm

Ah yes, good point.  Well that makes things easier for Fed.  He just has to do well at Cinc (F)  with Nadal not reaching QF  I think.  He's now 5 points behind Murray already technically.

Daniel

Posts : 2854
Join date : 2013-11-06

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Re: Fight for #1

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 3 of 3 Previous  1, 2, 3

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum