Which h2h is really interesting?

Easy: Wilander versus Tenez

Put those 2 in 1 room and you'll have a great debate.

I actually agree with a lot of what he says....but sometimes...I don't know why or whether it's their jobs to sell the players but they come with absurd comments....like comparing talent of Murray and Federer....for me talent can only be compared if Murray had stayed in his "natural" shape like Federer....and I am pretty sure that had he not bulked up as much, he woudl get bagelled by Federer, even with a bad back. I just guess commentators are not allowed to dwell too much on the physical side.

I am not sure whether you listened to him but he clearly wanted Stan and Fed to win in their respsective matches.

In summary what he says is usually pretty spot on...I disagree on a few things but that is due to having to please people of all nationalities. Imagine if they gave me the job...I'd piss teh whole world bar Switzerland...I guess.

Tenez wrote:or whether it's their jobs to sell the players

I think that is sort of the substance of their job.

This is why i posted this.
To be honest T, at some point i would have believed that Wilander and you are the same person. You 2 do have the same view on tennis. A very good view! And both big federer fans, Wilander bothered with his supposed objective view though. (the "roger has no balls" remark was nothing but frustration from a fan: Mats wanted so bad Roger to beat Nadal in 2006).
I'm not talking about Murrays soft hands but overall you sound more like Mats than i think you realize.

Still, i'd like you two to go toe to toe

he,he....nice one GP!

Wilander can be a breath of fresh air when he wants to....Tenez on the other hand, oh one tough cookie! he,he, definitely a great debate.

I'd be happy to serve the drinks during the debate

I ll take it as a compliment I guess...But I still prefer my game than Wilander's. Unlike Wilander I'd rather lose with panache than moonball.

Tenez wrote:But I still prefer my game than Wilander's.

But that's a different issue. One plays to his abilities. Like uncle Tony once said: i would have made an attacking player of Rafa..if he only could

Did he say that? That's funny.

I realise I may have sounded pretty vein in my last post....my tennis is crap and it's level cannot be compared with Wilander's of course...yet I felt I had the will to do more with the ball than Mats.

On those words....good night.