Barcelona 2016
+4
luvsports!
raiders_of_the_lost_ark
Autumnleaf
Tenez
8 posters
Our Tennis Forum :: Tennis :: Tennis
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 
1, 2
Re: Barcelona 2016
by Daniel Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:10 pm
Tenez can win any argument, because he can make facts fit models and not the other way around. Anyone can make up a theory that fits one fact (Nadal won). You could do the same with anything. Federer wins = Opponent was tired. Federer loses = Opponent was too good. It doesn't require any brain power. And it's garbage.
Nishikori lost because
A. He doesn't have the bottle
B. He doesn't have the serve (partly due this height and also A.)
C. Nadal played well and consistently.
I've been on this forum a while and I think your problem, Tenez, is that you reduce a debate with tons of factors down to 1 factor. And life is not that basic.
Nishikori lost because
A. He doesn't have the bottle
B. He doesn't have the serve (partly due this height and also A.)
C. Nadal played well and consistently.
I've been on this forum a while and I think your problem, Tenez, is that you reduce a debate with tons of factors down to 1 factor. And life is not that basic.
Daniel- Posts : 3645
Join date : 2013-11-06
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics» Wimbledon 2016 : Daily prediction game Day-1 27-June-2016
» Wimbledon 2016 : Daily prediction game Day-2 28-June-2016
» ATP 500/250: Barcelona, Bucharest
» Barcelona 2017
» Barcelona 2018
» Wimbledon 2016 : Daily prediction game Day-2 28-June-2016
» ATP 500/250: Barcelona, Bucharest
» Barcelona 2017
» Barcelona 2018
Our Tennis Forum :: Tennis :: Tennis
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|
» I Just Can't Help Believing!
» The Bullshit of Rafael Nadal
» Why Trump's 'tough' stance on radical Islam... could lead to more terrorism
» Missing Madeline 10 years on..
» '15 Dubious Weak Era Records'
» AO 2024 - Sinner baby!!
» Paris Masters
» Alvarez could bring me back to tennis