ATP 1000: Rome
+11
summerblues
truffin1
sphairistike
Gable70
BlueClay
gallery play
Tenez
raiders_of_the_lost_ark
luvsports!
paulcz
noleisthebest
15 posters
Our Tennis Forum :: Tennis :: Tennis
Page 7 of 12
Page 7 of 12 • 1, 2, 3 ... 6, 7, 8 ... 10, 11, 12
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Poor Fed....he has played all week in the cool late nights and suddenly after very little rest he will be asked to play Nadal in the middle of the day. It's going to be a completely different game.
Fed looks unhappy nowadays. His cut makes him also look tired.
Fed looks unhappy nowadays. His cut makes him also look tired.
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Look at the bright side - he could not have asked for a better draw. All in all he cannot complain this tournament.Tenez wrote:Poor Fed....he has played all week in the cool late nights and suddenly after very little rest he will be asked to play Nadal in the middle of the day. It's going to be a completely different game.
summerblues- Posts : 5068
Join date : 2012-05-19
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
gallery play wrote:10% chance.
10-20% for me. Unlike you, GP, even though I should know better, I will watch in hope Federer somehow pulls through.Tenez wrote:Well the odds on clay are 1/7 based on historical results (14%)...but I think Fed can do it. I'll believe till the very end.
But I am afraid in the end I may have to settle for consoling myself with the thought that a Rafa win will ensure Roger and Rafa are in the opposite halves of the draw at RG (of course, for all I know Andy will indeed pull out which will ruin this too).
summerblues- Posts : 5068
Join date : 2012-05-19
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Actually Paire and JJ played very well and it was not plain sailing for Fed. We know how scared Nadal is of big hitters and he must have been happy it was Berdych instead of JJ.
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
BTW, today was possibly the most aggressive I have ever seen Rafa play. It worked well today and looked quite good against Berdych but I wonder whether it would have worked so well against Nole. Nole would have defended far better and I suspect when push came to shove, Rafa's percentages might not have been good enough to win. But it was probably a good strategy against Berdych.
summerblues- Posts : 5068
Join date : 2012-05-19
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
It was not plain sailing for Fed, and they did play ok, but it is always hard to tell objectively - just based on a couple of matches - how much of it was due to their great play and how much of it was due to maybe Fed being a bit off. Especially today, Fed looked a bit shaky at times and one wonders whether a better player would have exploited it more successfully than Benoit did.Tenez wrote:Actually Paire and JJ played very well and it was not plain sailing for Fed. We know how scared Nadal is of big hitters and he must have been happy it was Berdych instead of JJ.
summerblues- Posts : 5068
Join date : 2012-05-19
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Agreed on Fed looking shaky today.
Strange as he played pretty well all week.
Strange as he played pretty well all week.
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Yes. However, these things can also be just somewhat random fluctuations in form - players in general do not play equally well day after day. Some days they play better than others, even if there may be no real reason for it. So let's just hope that is all there is to it and that tomorrow he will be at his best. He will need that (and, unfortunately, likely more than that ) to do well.Tenez wrote:Agreed on Fed looking shaky today.
Strange as he played pretty well all week.
summerblues- Posts : 5068
Join date : 2012-05-19
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
And finally....the final!
It's Fedal, Part 30.
Rome, 3.00 PM
We have all seen it before.
It's good to keep trying and and it's good to be given another chance.
Another chance to have a go at taming the beast. Don't waste it.
Do it like it's your last time Roger!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anxqSb3XrGE
It's Fedal, Part 30.
Rome, 3.00 PM
We have all seen it before.
It's good to keep trying and and it's good to be given another chance.
Another chance to have a go at taming the beast. Don't waste it.
Do it like it's your last time Roger!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anxqSb3XrGE
noleisthebest- Posts : 27907
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Tenez wrote:Poor Fed....he has played all week in the cool late nights and suddenly after very little rest he will be asked to play Nadal in the middle of the day. It's going to be a completely different game.
Fed looks unhappy nowadays. His cut makes him also look tired.
I read somewhere that Federer and Nadal were playing exactly the times they requested to the tournament organizers. Federer prefers to play at night and Nadal prefers to play in the afternoon. Obviously top players such as Federer and Nadal both being legends are given certain privileges after all of these years and deservedly so.
BlueClay- Posts : 366
Join date : 2012-12-26
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Tenez wrote:Actually Paire and JJ played very well and it was not plain sailing for Fed. We know how scared Nadal is of big hitters and he must have been happy it was Berdych instead of JJ.
Yes because we all know Nadal has losing records against big hitters such as Del Potro, Tsonga and Isner.
Seriously, where is the basis for your comment that Nadal is scared of big hitters? Because of his lone Rosol loss?
I am not a fan of Nadal's style of tennis and I don't believe a word of his injuries over the years but some of you on here go way too far in your Nadal hate and stray too far from reality with your Nadal obvervations.
BlueClay- Posts : 366
Join date : 2012-12-26
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
BlueClay wrote:Tenez wrote:Actually Paire and JJ played very well and it was not plain sailing for Fed. We know how scared Nadal is of big hitters and he must have been happy it was Berdych instead of JJ.
Yes because we all know Nadal has losing records against big hitters such as Del Potro, Tsonga and Isner.
Seriously, where is the basis for your comment that Nadal is scared of big hitters? Because of his lone Rosol loss?
I am not a fan of Nadal's style of tennis and I don't believe a word of his injuries over the years but some of you on here go way too far in your Nadal hate and stray too far from reality with your Nadal obvervations.
Maybe because of his lone loss to Soderling?
noleisthebest- Posts : 27907
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
The way to beat rafa? Hit him off the court or match him fitness wise. Both very hard to do (more the latter imo).
Only novak has him mentally.
Only novak has him mentally.
luvsports!- Posts : 4718
Join date : 2012-09-28
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
BlueClay wrote:Tenez wrote:Actually Paire and JJ played very well and it was not plain sailing for Fed. We know how scared Nadal is of big hitters and he must have been happy it was Berdych instead of JJ.
Yes because we all know Nadal has losing records against big hitters such as Del Potro, Tsonga and Isner.
Seriously, where is the basis for your comment that Nadal is scared of big hitters? Because of his lone Rosol loss?
I am not a fan of Nadal's style of tennis and I don't believe a word of his injuries over the years but some of you on here go way too far in your Nadal hate and stray too far from reality with your Nadal obvervations.
I too don't think Nadal is afraid of big hitters. It may look like he is perhaps because he stands 4m behind the baseline to receive the serve or keep scrambling all over the court against those shots they hit. But that essentially his game plan and he completely know what he is doing. Like all plans there will be days when they didn't work and some big hitter may blow him off the court ( Soderling RG 09, Tsonga AO, Rosol W12 etc), but the same plan has won him 11 Slams. If there is any game-plan that can win 11 slams, I'm 100% certain being given that results it can produce, almost all the players will happily take it even if some of the fans think it looks cowardice.
Nadal is not coward nor he is afraid of anyone. He is highly disciplined and focused his game and game-plan he very well know what he is doing. I'm not a fan of Nadal nor this game-plan but this is so effective that I don't see why Nadal wouldn't keep it.
raiders_of_the_lost_ark- Posts : 3499
Join date : 2012-07-20
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
BlueClay wrote:Tenez wrote:Actually Paire and JJ played very well and it was not plain sailing for Fed. We know how scared Nadal is of big hitters and he must have been happy it was Berdych instead of JJ.
Yes because we all know Nadal has losing records against big hitters such as Del Potro, Tsonga and Isner.
Seriously, where is the basis for your comment that Nadal is scared of big hitters? Because of his lone Rosol loss?
I am not a fan of Nadal's style of tennis and I don't believe a word of his injuries over the years but some of you on here go way too far in your Nadal hate and stray too far from reality with your Nadal obvervations.
Well...you ignore conveniently Soderling, Rosol, and yes the others you mention including Gulbis who are certainly not giving Nadal an easy ride as you suggest. And yes Nadal is certainly scared of them unless you believe that at 2 points of losing a match everything is under control for Nadal. When facing those guys Nadal knows the match is in their racquet and it's obvious he is scared. He knows the match will be down to a handful of key points played under pressure.
As LS says, it's not the granollers and Volandri that Nadal fears. It's those with power and/or stamina.
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Not having an easy ride doesn't mean he is afraid of them. Power hitters are no easy opponent for anyone, and it has to be naturally as their game is huge to counter. Nadal has winning records against all big-tall-powerful players. An occasional loss doesn't change anything.
Nadal's matches are almost always down to a handful of key points under pressure, but he hasn't won 11 slams and 23 TMS without having to dealt with those. He game-plan is effective enough against anyone including Djokovic. Power-players can trouble him, but in all these years he has shown enough times that he sure can deal with them. At least enough not to be afraid of them.
Nadal's matches are almost always down to a handful of key points under pressure, but he hasn't won 11 slams and 23 TMS without having to dealt with those. He game-plan is effective enough against anyone including Djokovic. Power-players can trouble him, but in all these years he has shown enough times that he sure can deal with them. At least enough not to be afraid of them.
raiders_of_the_lost_ark- Posts : 3499
Join date : 2012-07-20
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
raiders_of_the_lost_ark wrote:Not having an easy ride doesn't mean he is afraid of them. Power hitters are no easy opponent for anyone, and it has to be naturally as their game is huge to counter. Nadal has winning records against all big-tall-powerful players. An occasional loss doesn't change anything.
Nadal's matches are almost always down to a handful of key points under pressure, but he hasn't won 11 slams and 23 TMS without having to dealt with those. He game-plan is effective enough against anyone including Djokovic. Power-players can trouble him, but in all these years he has shown enough times that he sure can deal with them. At least enough not to be afraid of them.
yes, rotla, but it would be interesting to see how often he has had to play them in early rounds compared to Federer or Djokovic.
He always seems to have cakewalk draws featuring either SBH-ers or Spaniards.
Every time he had a power-hitter early on he struggled (Rosol, Isner in RG).
The way he plays the game reflects his character very well. And I would not call his tennis brave.
Brave players go on the court and don't get coached during a match, intimidate umpires for trying to enforce the rules, they don't go and bump into lower ranked player in the change-over either.
Nadal's 11 slams are not a testimony to his tennis playing talent, at least as far as I am concerned. I know many will disagree, but that does not bother me in the least.
noleisthebest- Posts : 27907
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Nitb can I ask what you thought of federer's comment that nole's fh at mp down in us open 11, was a "lucky" shot?
Deffo not his best moment!
Deffo not his best moment!
luvsports!- Posts : 4718
Join date : 2012-09-28
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
raiders_of_the_lost_ark wrote:Not having an easy ride doesn't mean he is afraid of them.
Nadal is afraid of everything. Not having his water bottles lined up is enough to panick him.
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
luvsports! wrote:Nitb can I ask what you thought of federer's comment that nole's fh at mp down in us open 11, was a "lucky" shot?
Deffo not his best moment!
He,he...you don't ask easy questions, do you ?
I thought he was quite rattled after that loss and who wouldn't be in his place with two match points on your serve?
The rest of that interview was very interesting, things he said to elaborate "the lucky shot" point were quite an eye-opener into his mindset, in fact. He saw that shot a product of Novak's tennis upbringing and in his eyes it was not "the proper" way: "slapping" the ball, like there's no tomorrow....
I could really see the Swiss in him when he said it. Swiss are a very prim and proper nation, their whole lives there are a continuous build up of little life achievements, there is very very little room for adventure. I am saying this as a caricature or a cliche just to illustrate the point, so don't pin me down on it.
It amazes me that somebody who plays tennis so audaciously like Federer cannot understand that same , albeit a wilder kind type of audacity from Djokovic.
Still, just like every biting interview he gave, however bitter it was to swallow initially, I have always liked and respected Federer's honesty. He has been right 9.5 out of 10.
And if you ask me, of course, that show was not lucky. Novak, as well as the other players hit it quite often. Just that the occasion was quite special. I really loved it, esp as it was the poetical answer to that bad, bad loss Nole suffered from Fed in RG SF.
noleisthebest- Posts : 27907
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Tenez wrote:raiders_of_the_lost_ark wrote:Not having an easy ride doesn't mean he is afraid of them.
Nadal is afraid of everything. Not having his water bottles lined up is enough to panick him.
That's a good answer from a seasoned horse on tennis forums. Loved it, now I'm with you that he is indeed afraid of everything.
raiders_of_the_lost_ark- Posts : 3499
Join date : 2012-07-20
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
raiders_of_the_lost_ark wrote:Tenez wrote:raiders_of_the_lost_ark wrote:Not having an easy ride doesn't mean he is afraid of them.
Nadal is afraid of everything. Not having his water bottles lined up is enough to panick him.
That's a good answer from a seasoned horse on tennis forums. Loved it, now I'm with you that he is indeed afraid of everything.
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
noleisthebest wrote:raiders_of_the_lost_ark wrote:Not having an easy ride doesn't mean he is afraid of them. Power hitters are no easy opponent for anyone, and it has to be naturally as their game is huge to counter. Nadal has winning records against all big-tall-powerful players. An occasional loss doesn't change anything.
Nadal's matches are almost always down to a handful of key points under pressure, but he hasn't won 11 slams and 23 TMS without having to dealt with those. He game-plan is effective enough against anyone including Djokovic. Power-players can trouble him, but in all these years he has shown enough times that he sure can deal with them. At least enough not to be afraid of them.
yes, rotla, but it would be interesting to see how often he has had to play them in early rounds compared to Federer or Djokovic.
He always seems to have cakewalk draws featuring either SBH-ers or Spaniards.
Every time he had a power-hitter early on he struggled (Rosol, Isner in RG).
The way he plays the game reflects his character very well. And I would not call his tennis brave.
Brave players go on the court and don't get coached during a match, intimidate umpires for trying to enforce the rules, they don't go and bump into lower ranked player in the change-over either.
Nadal's 11 slams are not a testimony to his tennis playing talent, at least as far as I am concerned. I know many will disagree, but that does not bother me in the least.
Totally agree and well replied nitb.
raiders_of_the_lost_ark- Posts : 3499
Join date : 2012-07-20
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
raiders_of_the_lost_ark wrote:
Totally agree and well replied nitb.
for a moment I thought that was Tenez that wrote this and I nearly had a heart attack
noleisthebest- Posts : 27907
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
noleisthebest wrote:raiders_of_the_lost_ark wrote:Not having an easy ride doesn't mean he is afraid of them. Power hitters are no easy opponent for anyone, and it has to be naturally as their game is huge to counter. Nadal has winning records against all big-tall-powerful players. An occasional loss doesn't change anything.
Nadal's matches are almost always down to a handful of key points under pressure, but he hasn't won 11 slams and 23 TMS without having to dealt with those. He game-plan is effective enough against anyone including Djokovic. Power-players can trouble him, but in all these years he has shown enough times that he sure can deal with them. At least enough not to be afraid of them.
yes, rotla, but it would be interesting to see how often he has had to play them in early rounds compared to Federer or Djokovic.
He always seems to have cakewalk draws featuring either SBH-ers or Spaniards.
Every time he had a power-hitter early on he struggled (Rosol, Isner in RG).
The way he plays the game reflects his character very well. And I would not call his tennis brave.
Brave players go on the court and don't get coached during a match, intimidate umpires for trying to enforce the rules, they don't go and bump into lower ranked player in the change-over either.
Nadal's 11 slams are not a testimony to his tennis playing talent, at least as far as I am concerned. I know many will disagree, but that does not bother me in the least.
Totally agree and well replied nitb!
Last edited by Tenez on Sun May 19, 2013 3:18 pm; edited 1 time in total
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Tenez wrote:May the massacre start!
you're in a good mood!
noleisthebest- Posts : 27907
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
I have found a link with a language I can't understand a word of, yipeeeee !!!!!!
noleisthebest- Posts : 27907
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
noleisthebest wrote:Tenez wrote:May the massacre start!
you're in a good mood!
The thing is we know that even if Fed wins the first set 6/2 he is still so far away from winning. So no point to get excited in those early stages.
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Tenez wrote:noleisthebest wrote:raiders_of_the_lost_ark wrote:Not having an easy ride doesn't mean he is afraid of them. Power hitters are no easy opponent for anyone, and it has to be naturally as their game is huge to counter. Nadal has winning records against all big-tall-powerful players. An occasional loss doesn't change anything.
Nadal's matches are almost always down to a handful of key points under pressure, but he hasn't won 11 slams and 23 TMS without having to dealt with those. He game-plan is effective enough against anyone including Djokovic. Power-players can trouble him, but in all these years he has shown enough times that he sure can deal with them. At least enough not to be afraid of them.
yes, rotla, but it would be interesting to see how often he has had to play them in early rounds compared to Federer or Djokovic.
He always seems to have cakewalk draws featuring either SBH-ers or Spaniards.
Every time he had a power-hitter early on he struggled (Rosol, Isner in RG).
The way he plays the game reflects his character very well. And I would not call his tennis brave.
Brave players go on the court and don't get coached during a match, intimidate umpires for trying to enforce the rules, they don't go and bump into lower ranked player in the change-over either.
Nadal's 11 slams are not a testimony to his tennis playing talent, at least as far as I am concerned. I know many will disagree, but that does not bother me in the least.
Totally agree and well replied nitb!
I must be dreaming!
noleisthebest- Posts : 27907
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Fed no choice again than to go for 3mm over the net and no more than 2mm away from the lines.
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Fed should move on the baseline to take his BH, not inside it, way too risky at the moment.
noleisthebest- Posts : 27907
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
I have seen very few of their matches (was my way of protesting against draw-rigging at the time).
Why has Nadal not received time warning by now, this is ridiculous!
Why has Nadal not received time warning by now, this is ridiculous!
noleisthebest- Posts : 27907
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
noleisthebest wrote:I have found a link with a language I can't understand a word of, yipeeeee !!!!!!
but the idiot is talking NON-STOP even through the points, so I'll have to find a different one
noleisthebest- Posts : 27907
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
I have the feeling they hate each other since the doping scandals emerged.
They just pretend.
They just pretend.
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Nadal strutting around full of himself....all the antics, towel, line cleaning, time-wasting...
Fed looks rattled and playing well below his average.Come on Rog, you CAN do it!!!!!
Fed looks rattled and playing well below his average.Come on Rog, you CAN do it!!!!!
noleisthebest- Posts : 27907
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Tenez wrote:I have the feeling they hate each other since the doping scandals emerged.
They just pretend.
Of course they do. Nole said it once in one Serbian talk-show....a couple of years ago.
noleisthebest- Posts : 27907
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Federer is spraying all over the place. Worse than v Nishi.
Clearly as I mentioned he was not quite prepared to playing daylight v Nadal
Clearly as I mentioned he was not quite prepared to playing daylight v Nadal
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
All...this match has all the marks of Hamburg 2007!
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Tenez wrote:Federer is spraying all over the place. Worse than v Nishi.
Clearly as I mentioned he was not quite prepared to playing daylight v Nadal
That's a good point. He looks like fish out of water atm. Hope his serve starts working in the 2nd. He is making Nadal looking better than he is. This looks very much like Olympic final against Murray, complete physical overpowering with little room for tennis.
noleisthebest- Posts : 27907
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Tenez wrote:All...this match has all the marks of Hamburg 2007!
I was beginning to be hopeful at deuce in this first game and then Fed's shot selection let him down....should've put away that voley not send it back to Nadal to pass him....
Wake up Roger, faaaaaaaaaaast!!!!!
noleisthebest- Posts : 27907
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Federer cannot do anything with this racquet. He is playing old school, with old school material...against diet and technology science.
It's embarassing...even if he is the one producing the best shots. 1W for 3 UEs is not good enough.
It's embarassing...even if he is the one producing the best shots. 1W for 3 UEs is not good enough.
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Fed starting to look a bit better now that he has taken his foot off the gas.
noleisthebest- Posts : 27907
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Tenez wrote:Federer cannot do anything with this racquet. He is playing old school, with old school material...against diet and technology science.
It's embarassing...even if he is the one producing the best shots. 1W for 3 UEs is not good enough.
I don't think it's embarassing, more traumatic to watch, well, at least for me.
noleisthebest- Posts : 27907
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Tenez wrote:Djoko woudl still beat that beast!
one of the few pleasures left in this life...
noleisthebest- Posts : 27907
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
I just don't understand why Federer looks so slow today, as if something took all the wind out of his sails...
noleisthebest- Posts : 27907
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
Goodall and Robbie having a Nadal worshipping session, have they no shame!!!?
noleisthebest- Posts : 27907
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: ATP 1000: Rome
And finally he breaks!!!!!!
Come on Rog, all is not over
Come on Rog, all is not over
noleisthebest- Posts : 27907
Join date : 2012-06-18
Page 7 of 12 • 1, 2, 3 ... 6, 7, 8 ... 10, 11, 12
Similar topics
» ATP Masters 1000: Rome
» ATP Masters 1000: Rome
» ATP Masters 1000: Rome
» ATP Masters 1000: Rome
» ATP Masters 1000: Rome
» ATP Masters 1000: Rome
» ATP Masters 1000: Rome
» ATP Masters 1000: Rome
» ATP Masters 1000: Rome
Our Tennis Forum :: Tennis :: Tennis
Page 7 of 12
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Sat Mar 23, 2024 9:00 pm by noleisthebest
» The Bullshit of Rafael Nadal
Mon Feb 12, 2024 12:15 am by Daniel2
» Why Trump's 'tough' stance on radical Islam... could lead to more terrorism
Thu Feb 01, 2024 4:32 am by Daniel2
» Missing Madeline 10 years on..
Thu Feb 01, 2024 4:31 am by Daniel2
» '15 Dubious Weak Era Records'
Thu Feb 01, 2024 4:06 am by Daniel2
» AO 2024 - Sinner baby!!
Thu Feb 01, 2024 4:05 am by Daniel2
» Paris Masters
Mon Nov 06, 2023 9:47 pm by noleisthebest
» Alvarez could bring me back to tennis
Wed Sep 20, 2023 10:25 am by raiders_of_the_lost_ark
» IDEMOOOOOOO! ! ! !
Mon Sep 11, 2023 9:47 am by noleisthebest