Who is better, Rune or Alcatraz?

I don't even know how old they both are, but I'm guessing a very similar age, say around 20.

From what I have seen (and it's not a lot), Rune is better. He doesn't seem to be loaded with steroids and although he runes a lot, he is not as desperate as Alcatraz.

Rune has a distinguishable game, modern, relying on good hitting on both wigs, reasonable arsenal of shots. Didn't pay attention how well he serves or returns.
He has a fiery temper and reeeeeaaaaaalllly hates losing.

Alcatraz on the other hand has steroided legs which he uses to run down balls in the style of Murrray and early  to mid Nadal. At the same time he is convinced he is an attacking player i.e. Federer.
He's been getting away with it vs most players but then he heard the DING-DONG in RG final when Nole DA BEST sat him or his arse, in short, Alcatraz shat himself and ended up cramping in the second set.

Now that all with brains saw that the emperor is naked, I believe the locker room aura has been dented.

I have witnessed how inadequate he is on grass and how fake his game, actually is.

The occasional trick shot which then nike sponsored commentators blow up to some ridiculous talent related language is not my problem.

I have a pair of beautiful, clever, big blue eyes and they see everything!

In short, Rune is better.

What a stupid question.  And Alcaraz is the best player in the world atm.

Really good insight from NITB.

The whole world is celebrating Djoko's loss and the superb win of Alcaraz, yet this sore loser immediately posts a Alcaraz vs Rune thread just as he kicked Noles ass, but Rune is better? hahaha, go cry for next 2 weeks now