Re: Fed's 2017 - 20 slams? No1? CYGS?

by Daniel Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:11 pm

The difference is obvious. Then I'll actually know BB's opinion (we still don't know it), rather than his pathetic attempt at heads he wins tails we lose. That simple. Why are you concerned with my question? I asked BB. Not you.

by Tenez Thu Mar 23, 2017 11:58 pm

... wrote:Aren't you happy Federer is back playing phenomenal tennis?

Eh no. The better Fed plays the more stubborn Daniel appears.

So clearly he put himself in a position where he can't fully enjoy Federer's wins. He is just waiting for his next loss to tell us how he is/was right....not realising that at 35....36 soon he has long lost the debate...whatever happens next.

by Daniel Fri Mar 24, 2017 10:05 am

Don't speak for me, thanks Winking

Especially since you just make facts up on the fly, as usual.

by Tenez Fri Mar 24, 2017 10:26 am

It's a fact actually. You have not missed an occasion to remind Fed's age after his every loss.

by Emancipator Fri Mar 24, 2017 4:11 pm

Daniel wrote:Don't speak for me, thanks Especially since you just make facts up on the fly, as usual.

by bogbrush Fri Mar 24, 2017 5:51 pm

Daniel wrote:The difference is obvious. Then I'll actually know BB's opinion (we still don't know it), rather than his pathetic attempt at heads he wins tails we lose. That simple. Why are you concerned with my question? I asked BB. Not you.

With complete sincerity I can tell you this; if you really can't understand the difference between respecting a guys knowledge and agreeing with him then I doubt I can explain it to you.

by Emancipator Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:52 pm

Nadal has a good chance to finish the year at number 1.

We know he'll play lots of tourneys - he always does - and if he wins RG and has a decent clay court season he'll stand a very good chance having virtually no points to defend after the FO.

by Emancipator Sat Mar 25, 2017 3:53 pm

Could be the first player to reclaim the number 1 title 3 times.

by Daniel Sat Mar 25, 2017 5:35 pm

bogbrush wrote:
Daniel wrote:The difference is obvious. Then I'll actually know BB's opinion (we still don't know it), rather than his pathetic attempt at heads he wins tails we lose. That simple. Why are you concerned with my question? I asked BB. Not you.
With complete sincerity I can tell you this; if you really can't understand the difference between respecting a guys knowledge and agreeing with him then I doubt I can explain it to you.

You still haven't answered the question. As I knew you wouldn't. Plain English is so much better for understanding than what you are doing... which is just retarded. Do you think Federer will be WN1 again? And what odds do you give of it happening? Applause

by bogbrush Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:20 pm

Actually, it's irrelevant. However I did express a view well before you started your ranting. It's why I found your nonsense so funny.

by Emancipator Sun Mar 26, 2017 2:40 pm

Not sure what all those stupid accusations were about but I was clear on your point of view right from the start - he's unlikely to play enough tournaments to be able to reach number 1 and it would probably require a massive drop in form for the top two.

Not sure what all the song and dance is about.. oh of course it's Daniel - he just has to be right about everything.

by Daniel Sun Mar 26, 2017 10:56 pm

bogbrush wrote:Actually, it's irrelevant. However I did express a view well before you started your ranting. It's why I found your nonsense so funny.

Still no answer. Thumbs Up

I saw what you wrote the first time. Then I saw a clear contradiction after it. And now you seem to be unable to actually answer in plain English. Basically, you like to go through life leaving ambiguities so you look like an oracle. You don't give absolute opinions on what will happen so that if you are wrong you can claim otherwise. It's just silly. Even Tenez doesn't do that. I don't really give a shit, but I know the smell of bullshit when it comes my way haha.

by bogbrush Mon Mar 27, 2017 10:56 am

Daniel wrote:
bogbrush wrote:Actually, it's irrelevant. However I did express a view well before you started your ranting. It's why I found your nonsense so funny.

Still no answer. I saw what you wrote the first time. Then I saw a clear contradiction after it. And now you seem to be unable to actually answer in plain English. Basically, you like to go through life leaving ambiguities so you look like an oracle. You don't give absolute opinions on what will happen so that if you are wrong you can claim otherwise. It's just silly. Even Tenez doesn't do that. I don't really give a shit, but I know the smell of bullshit when it comes my way haha.

You do know that you're only one who thinks you're pulling this off don't you?

by Daniel Tue Mar 28, 2017 2:39 pm

I have no idea what you are on about, and I no longer care. You've clearly got an issue and you are boring me. See ya Winking

I prefer plain English and can't be bothered with those that don't.

by bogbrush Tue Mar 28, 2017 2:57 pm

Daniel wrote:I have no idea what you are on about, and I no longer care. You've clearly got an issue and you are boring me. See ya I prefer plain English and can't be bothered with those that don't.

I'll try really short words next time.

by Emancipator Tue Mar 28, 2017 4:48 pm

LOL, Abu-Daniel Pwned again Laugh

by Veejay Tue Mar 28, 2017 6:08 pm

federer,nadal,djokovic and murray all confirmed to play madrid

by Daniel Tue Mar 28, 2017 7:59 pm

TMF wrote:LOL, Abu-Daniel Pwned again

More like you are just a silly sycophant who thinks "pwned" makes you look hip. Doofus haha.

by Tenez Wed Mar 29, 2017 12:16 am

Veejay wrote:federer,nadal,djokovic and murray all confirmed to play madrid

Thanks Vee for keeping this thread on subject. Winking

Interesting to see Fed signing for Madrid.

by Sponsored content

Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat	Sun
		1	2	3	4	5
6	7	8	9	10	11	12
13	14	15	16	17	18	19
20	21	22	23	24	25	26
27	28	29	30	31