ATP 1000: Indian Wells
+11
gallery play
truffin1
summerblues
BlueClay
raiders_of_the_lost_ark
laverfan
paulcz
luvsports!
sphairistike
Tenez
noleisthebest
15 posters
Our Tennis Forum :: Tennis :: Tennis
Page 16 of 16
Page 16 of 16 • 1 ... 9 ... 14, 15, 16
Re: ATP 1000: Indian Wells
Good riddance.
Stay away from V2 too. It's been a much better place since you left.
Stay away from V2 too. It's been a much better place since you left.
Emancipator- Posts : 959
Join date : 2013-02-12
Re: ATP 1000: Indian Wells
TMF wrote:Good riddance.
Stay away from V2 too. It's been a much better place since you left.
You haven't explained why you think Nadal is a 'rubbish moonballer' yet.
Or given me the username of any Federer fan who currently posts on 606v2 who:
a) Has said he/she dislikes me
b) Has started posting again when I left.
You said there were many, but couldn't even name one.
Larry Ellison- Posts : 1222
Join date : 2012-07-21
Re: ATP 1000: Indian Wells
There are lots of people posting sensibly on V2 now compared to when you accounted for approx half the posts on any given day, clogging up the forum with repetitive, duplicitous and downright stupid comments.
Typical Red conversation:
Normal sane poster: I disagree with your opinion regarding X. The data presented doesn't support your point of view, which is basically a subjective one.
Crazy Nadal Fan (Amrit/IMBL/Red/L. Ellison/Nad's wedgie): Exactly which point out of the 5 million that I cut and pasted from Wiki doesn't support my point of view? What do you think of point 3563? Do you have an answer to this?
Normal sane poster: None of your points actually make any sense. They've all been intepreted in a highly subjective manner and you've unfortunately cherry picked only the parts of the data which support your point of view. In fact this bit of the data, which you didn't include, actually goes completely against your viewpoint. Why didn't you include this?
Crazy Nadal Fan (Amrit/IMBL/Red/L. Ellison/Nad's wedgie): (Ignoring the question posed) You didn't answer my question about point 3563. What do you have to say about it? My research shows blah blah blah. Betweem 2003 and and 26 Jan 2008, Federer only lost half a match to all the other male and female players on tour, but from Jan to March of the same year he lost 15 matches to Nadal, therefore once Nadal learned to play on HC's and Grass he became the best. Which is why Nadal is the GOAT and Federer is third on the list.
Normal sane Poster: Huh? ok now I'm lost. But anyway didn't Rafa win HC nasters in 2005 and reach the W final in 2006?
Crazy Nadal Fan (Amrit/IMBL/Red/L. Ellison/Nad's wedgie): Yeah but Uncle Toni was training him on clay until June 2008, then in two weeks he played on grass 24/7 until he matured, then he won Wimbledon.
Normal sane poster: Ah but Murray beat him at the USO in 2008!
Crazy Nadal Fan (Amrit/IMBL/Red/L. Ellison/Nad's wedgie): actually that was the match when Nadal was so tired he couldn't move. In fact if you watch the match in slow motion (like I've done) you'll see that there are 3 occasions when Nadal didn't pull a wedgie out of his a**. Why? because he was too tired from playing on grass 24/7 for two weeks (Uncle Toni didn't let him eat and drink during that period and locked him in cupboard for an hour a day to get some rest). I have a list of all the matches that Nadal hast lost when fit and this isn't one of them. In fact the list only has two matches on it.
Normal sane poster: Ok this is just getting weird, I think i'm out.
Crazy Nadal Fan (Amrit/IMBL/Red/L. Ellison/Nad's wedgie): Wait, wait you didn't answer point 5634.
Normal sane poster: Save it buddy, this is sucking the life out of me.
Crazy Nadal Fan (Amrit/IMBL/Red/L. Ellison/Nad's wedgie): No worries, I'll PM you the full question list. I also want your view on points 73645254 and 856355292909. Now I think I'll change my username and post all five million points on another topic which is actually about tennis.
Typical Red conversation:
Normal sane poster: I disagree with your opinion regarding X. The data presented doesn't support your point of view, which is basically a subjective one.
Crazy Nadal Fan (Amrit/IMBL/Red/L. Ellison/Nad's wedgie): Exactly which point out of the 5 million that I cut and pasted from Wiki doesn't support my point of view? What do you think of point 3563? Do you have an answer to this?
Normal sane poster: None of your points actually make any sense. They've all been intepreted in a highly subjective manner and you've unfortunately cherry picked only the parts of the data which support your point of view. In fact this bit of the data, which you didn't include, actually goes completely against your viewpoint. Why didn't you include this?
Crazy Nadal Fan (Amrit/IMBL/Red/L. Ellison/Nad's wedgie): (Ignoring the question posed) You didn't answer my question about point 3563. What do you have to say about it? My research shows blah blah blah. Betweem 2003 and and 26 Jan 2008, Federer only lost half a match to all the other male and female players on tour, but from Jan to March of the same year he lost 15 matches to Nadal, therefore once Nadal learned to play on HC's and Grass he became the best. Which is why Nadal is the GOAT and Federer is third on the list.
Normal sane Poster: Huh? ok now I'm lost. But anyway didn't Rafa win HC nasters in 2005 and reach the W final in 2006?
Crazy Nadal Fan (Amrit/IMBL/Red/L. Ellison/Nad's wedgie): Yeah but Uncle Toni was training him on clay until June 2008, then in two weeks he played on grass 24/7 until he matured, then he won Wimbledon.
Normal sane poster: Ah but Murray beat him at the USO in 2008!
Crazy Nadal Fan (Amrit/IMBL/Red/L. Ellison/Nad's wedgie): actually that was the match when Nadal was so tired he couldn't move. In fact if you watch the match in slow motion (like I've done) you'll see that there are 3 occasions when Nadal didn't pull a wedgie out of his a**. Why? because he was too tired from playing on grass 24/7 for two weeks (Uncle Toni didn't let him eat and drink during that period and locked him in cupboard for an hour a day to get some rest). I have a list of all the matches that Nadal hast lost when fit and this isn't one of them. In fact the list only has two matches on it.
Normal sane poster: Ok this is just getting weird, I think i'm out.
Crazy Nadal Fan (Amrit/IMBL/Red/L. Ellison/Nad's wedgie): Wait, wait you didn't answer point 5634.
Normal sane poster: Save it buddy, this is sucking the life out of me.
Crazy Nadal Fan (Amrit/IMBL/Red/L. Ellison/Nad's wedgie): No worries, I'll PM you the full question list. I also want your view on points 73645254 and 856355292909. Now I think I'll change my username and post all five million points on another topic which is actually about tennis.
Emancipator- Posts : 959
Join date : 2013-02-12
Re: ATP 1000: Indian Wells
The above was not a satire but an actual transcript of about five thousand Red conversations.
Emancipator- Posts : 959
Join date : 2013-02-12
Re: ATP 1000: Indian Wells
Could you please stop calling me 'Nadal's wedgie'?
It's unnecessary name-calling.
As usual you actually didn't give me any names.
Let me ask again:
Give me the username of any Federer fan who currently posts on 606v2 who:
a) Has said he/she dislikes me
b) Has started posting again when I left.
As for your flailing attempt at satire, you've clearly done a lot of research into my points on 606v2- but you've made many mistakes. I think Murray beat Nadal in USO 2008 simply because Murray played fantastic tennis and deserved to win- simple.
It's unnecessary name-calling.
As usual you actually didn't give me any names.
Let me ask again:
Give me the username of any Federer fan who currently posts on 606v2 who:
a) Has said he/she dislikes me
b) Has started posting again when I left.
As for your flailing attempt at satire, you've clearly done a lot of research into my points on 606v2- but you've made many mistakes. I think Murray beat Nadal in USO 2008 simply because Murray played fantastic tennis and deserved to win- simple.
Larry Ellison- Posts : 1222
Join date : 2012-07-21
Re: ATP 1000: Indian Wells
I think it's pretty clear that Nadal improved his game as he got older- on all surfaces including grass and hard courts.
I don't think many people are disputing that.
I don't think many people are disputing that.
Larry Ellison- Posts : 1222
Join date : 2012-07-21
Page 16 of 16 • 1 ... 9 ... 14, 15, 16
Similar topics
» ATP 1000: Indian Wells
» ATP Masters 1000: Indian Wells
» Masters 1000: Indian Wells
» Indian Wells
» Indian Wells Draw
» ATP Masters 1000: Indian Wells
» Masters 1000: Indian Wells
» Indian Wells
» Indian Wells Draw
Our Tennis Forum :: Tennis :: Tennis
Page 16 of 16
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Sat Mar 23, 2024 9:00 pm by noleisthebest
» The Bullshit of Rafael Nadal
Mon Feb 12, 2024 12:15 am by Daniel2
» Why Trump's 'tough' stance on radical Islam... could lead to more terrorism
Thu Feb 01, 2024 4:32 am by Daniel2
» Missing Madeline 10 years on..
Thu Feb 01, 2024 4:31 am by Daniel2
» '15 Dubious Weak Era Records'
Thu Feb 01, 2024 4:06 am by Daniel2
» AO 2024 - Sinner baby!!
Thu Feb 01, 2024 4:05 am by Daniel2
» Paris Masters
Mon Nov 06, 2023 9:47 pm by noleisthebest
» Alvarez could bring me back to tennis
Wed Sep 20, 2023 10:25 am by raiders_of_the_lost_ark
» IDEMOOOOOOO! ! ! !
Mon Sep 11, 2023 9:47 am by noleisthebest