Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
+5
noleisthebest
luvsports!
Tenez
N2D2L
SayonaRa
9 posters
Our Tennis Forum :: Tennis :: Tennis
Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
No one REALLY expected Stan to win (except perhaps FK) even after the guy made it to WTF and dethroned Djoko within just 3 months. But Stan signified so little threat that amri didn’t even bother jinxing him Sunday. Big mistake.
By contrast, Fed losing form with advancing age and carrying a nagging back issue still inspires fear in many nadal fans. It’s so good to see amri still so much in awe of Fed’s greatness that she believes the old champ can beat her idol last Friday. So she was jinxing Fed like her life depended on it, further reinforcing the jinxes with the blisters excuses etc.
My point is: we so often hear nadal fan’s tireless weak era, h2h and other mindless arguments aiming to denigrate Roger and elevate nadal. But the truth I see is that they STILL fear the one who’s been popularly anointed the true and test GOAT. Much felt attention and envy from nadal fans towards the Old Man is testament to the fact that the awesome champion may be down but FAR from out.
As a side note, while nadal fans are scared witless of Fed, Nadal himself knows better who he fears. Not Fed, he fears Warwrinka. He was actually completely consumed by that fear from beginning to end in the Sunday final because he knew his own game/form wouldn’t quite measure up vs Stan, the New Man.
SayonaRa- Posts : 616
Join date : 2012-07-26
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
Well actually now Nadal is in permanent decline, every single match he plays is a huge challenge.
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
Sure didn't look that way before he met Stan.
But a good early for jinxing. Lots to defend from now He'd need all the luck he can get.
But a good early for jinxing. Lots to defend from now He'd need all the luck he can get.
SayonaRa- Posts : 616
Join date : 2012-07-26
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
I don't understand why people say 'lots to defend' as a negative?
It doesn't actually mean anything for this year apart from the fact he's going to be seeded high for a bit even if he does badly.
It doesn't actually mean anything for this year apart from the fact he's going to be seeded high for a bit even if he does badly.
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
He was lucky Tomic was injured. Then lucky Monfils played badly. Then Nishikori outplayed him, lucky to get through that. Then Dimi could have easily beaten him, just luck he missed on SP. Then he was lucky Fed had a back injury. Then he got destroyed by Stan in the final, despite being at 100% all throughout the match.SR wrote:Sure didn't look that way before he met Stan.
QED permanent decline
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
Stop trolling.
I'm saying Fed remains the GOAT while nadal sinks below expectation.
You didn't even bother to read my thread. Yeah you bragged that nadal gave a "blistering performance" vs Fed but now claiming "he is in permanent decline" just 2 days later when he lost to a player unexpectedly.
If you can't handle comments exposing your idol being nothing but an over-rated and disrespectful hunk prone to foul play due to his OBVIOUS lack of game/talent, then don't response,OK?
I'm saying Fed remains the GOAT while nadal sinks below expectation.
You didn't even bother to read my thread. Yeah you bragged that nadal gave a "blistering performance" vs Fed but now claiming "he is in permanent decline" just 2 days later when he lost to a player unexpectedly.
If you can't handle comments exposing your idol being nothing but an over-rated and disrespectful hunk prone to foul play due to his OBVIOUS lack of game/talent, then don't response,OK?
SayonaRa- Posts : 616
Join date : 2012-07-26
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
The fact he got to a Grand Slam Final despite being in permanent decline is stunning- I think you are right though that he was consumed by fear of facing Stan Wawrinka in the final; makes perfect sense.
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
What do you make of the fact nadal is absolutely incapable of winning while slightly below par. I have seen Federer, even Stan winning slams while not being at their best.
Weather strategic MTO or not it was too clear again how it affects a player with talent as Stan was all over the place that MTO and he struggled closing a match out...even v what seemed to be an injured opponent. Imagine if Nadal had played full speed from then on? It would have been a straight 4 or 5 setter. MTOs are much more annoying when we (the players) suspect them to be strategic. If a player who typically doesn't take MTO takes one, then there is clearly a concern for his opponent and though it may affe ct him, knowing it was NOT for disrupting his rhythm, is much easier to take than knowing it is to upset him.
Connors won a few slams he would have clearly lost if it was not for constantly trying to upset his opponent and take him out of his zone.
We as spectator can actually appreciate how a player reacts under such circumstances but frankly, it's ugly behaviour.
Weather strategic MTO or not it was too clear again how it affects a player with talent as Stan was all over the place that MTO and he struggled closing a match out...even v what seemed to be an injured opponent. Imagine if Nadal had played full speed from then on? It would have been a straight 4 or 5 setter. MTOs are much more annoying when we (the players) suspect them to be strategic. If a player who typically doesn't take MTO takes one, then there is clearly a concern for his opponent and though it may affe ct him, knowing it was NOT for disrupting his rhythm, is much easier to take than knowing it is to upset him.
Connors won a few slams he would have clearly lost if it was not for constantly trying to upset his opponent and take him out of his zone.
We as spectator can actually appreciate how a player reacts under such circumstances but frankly, it's ugly behaviour.
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
He beat Dimitrov, and he was way way way below par.
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
Not as below par as he would be without his doctors and their chemistry. So you cannot have it both ways cause Dimi is much more talented than Nadal. He doesn't need to break a leg, or his back to win a match.Julia Santamaria wrote:He beat Dimitrov, and he was way way way below par.
Will you admit that Nadal looked pretty close to his best in that first set v Stan and yet was close to lose it 61?
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
You were the one talking about how Nadal was below par in the first set against Stan?
Nadal nearly broke back at 3-5, but Stan was too good in the key moments of the 1st set. And I don't see how it was close to 6-1, Stan only had his BP in one game.
Nadal nearly broke back at 3-5, but Stan was too good in the key moments of the 1st set. And I don't see how it was close to 6-1, Stan only had his BP in one game.
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
Wasn't at his very best in that first set but still much fitter than Stan, moving much quicker and hitting the ball much harder.....so...what does that tell you, talent wise?
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
Julia Santamaria wrote:He beat Dimitrov, and he was way way way below par.
Yes, the faker was useless and scared, that's for sure. That's why he managed to beat Dimi only with the help of the blister & time violation GAMESMANSHIP.
You still haven't answer my question, if he's that good and talented, why does he need so much help from foul play and breaking all the rules to win? WHY?
SayonaRa- Posts : 616
Join date : 2012-07-26
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
Add Rosol, Darcis, Warwrinka......Tenez wrote:Dimi is much more talented than Nadal. He doesn't need to break a leg, or his back to win a match.
Many more will expose nadal's lack of talent soon. That's getting very easy to do because his magic potion is failing him as he ages very rapidly.
SayonaRa- Posts : 616
Join date : 2012-07-26
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
Nadal is a better sportsman than Federer.
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
Maybe but I am a better poster than you!Julia Santamaria wrote:Nadal is a better sportsman than Federer.
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
Julia Santamaria wrote:You were the one talking about how Nadal was below par in the first set against Stan?
Nadal nearly broke back at 3-5, but Stan was too good in the key moments of the 1st set. And I don't see how it was close to 6-1, Stan only had his BP in one game.
He actually had a break point or 2 to go up 2 breaks for 5-1.
luvsports!- Posts : 4718
Join date : 2012-09-28
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
In what way is Nadal a better sportsman?
luvsports!- Posts : 4718
Join date : 2012-09-28
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
If only.Julia Santamaria wrote:Nadal is a better sportsman than Federer.
Federer, Federer, Federer......all you've done with this wishful and baseless claim is to show how awe-inspiring the one with the most slams still is. You've just proven my point!
The only other thing nadal does better than Roger, besides cheating mid-match, is pose in those cheap Armani underwear ads.
SayonaRa- Posts : 616
Join date : 2012-07-26
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
BwhahahahahahahaTenez wrote:Maybe but I am a better poster than you!Julia Santamaria wrote:Nadal is a better sportsman than Federer.
You are. They're kicking themselves now for banning you at V2.
SayonaRa- Posts : 616
Join date : 2012-07-26
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
Thanks SR!SR wrote:BwhahahahahahahaTenez wrote:Maybe but I am a better poster than you!Julia Santamaria wrote:Nadal is a better sportsman than Federer.
You are. They're kicking themselves now for banning you at V2.
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
LS, do you want me to do a Federer post, as people write about Nadal on here?
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
Ducking away from responding to to my reply though...Tenez wrote:Maybe but I am a better poster than you!Julia Santamaria wrote:Nadal is a better sportsman than Federer.
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
No thanks maybe a PM?
luvsports!- Posts : 4718
Join date : 2012-09-28
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
I will probably post it here rather than PM, as long as people keep in mind that it's meant to be an imitation to show how easy constructing these attacks are.
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
Earlier someone asked why I think Roger Federer is a worse sportsman than Rafael Nadal. In reality they are both pretty horrific, but Frauderer probably shades it in his disgusting gamesmanship. Here just a few of many examples.
Firstly HE IS THE ONLY PLAYER I HAVE EVER SEE SWEARING AT AN UMPIRE. I'm not making this stuff up. I have seen many players get angry at the umpire, but swearing at the umpire?? Only Roger Federer could do that, and for barely any reason too. Del Potro's challenge was not even successful, and Federer could have easily chosen to talk the umpire respectfully.
But instead what does he do? He tells the umpire 'I don't give a shit what you say' DISGRACEFUL
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=koTTY3QuLcQ
But it gets even worse!!!
Not only does this pathetic excuse for a sportsman swear and abuse the officials with his bad language, he also swears at his opponent. I HAVE NEVER SEEN A PLAYER SWEAR AT HIS OPPONENT LIKE THIS BEFORE. Not in tennis anyway, Federer really does bring tennis into disrepute with this disgraceful play.
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ThfTKULMIw
And after this, Federer fans still think that with a straight face they can defend him winning a sportsmanship award, just because NIKE and ATP have put pressure on players to vote for Roger so that tennis makes more money. ROFLMAO
I don't know what's funnier, Frauderer worshippers thinking the sportsmanship award isn't controlled by money and the ATP, or people thinking Roger isn't one of the worst sportsmen of our times.
But we're not even started yet, if we're on a list of things Roger has done which is disgraceful. He has attempted PURE CHEATING, yes I repeat PURE CHEATING on court against his equally pathetic rivals who owns him.
Federer here tried to CHEAT by tricking the umpire by pointing to the wrong mark. The mark he is pointing to is nowhere near the one it shows on Hawkeye, and we can even see from the video the ball was well in, far away from the mark Roger was trying to cheat with. But will that stop this cheat? NO, OF COURSE IT WON'T.
What's funny is Roger still lost the match
He tried to cheat, yet Nadal handed Roger's ass on a plate LMFAO
Answer me SR, how comes Roger tried to cheat and trick the umpire, and still managed to get humiliated LOL
But it's not just rude behaviour towards the umpire and opponents Roger is guilty of, this guy also abuses the crowd.
Look at this video of Frauderer screaming at the crowd: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7R8VI6kSV5A
Even in football I don't see players scream at the crowd like that, not normally anyway. Once again Federer bringing the sport into disrepute.
As for MTOs, Nadal is bad, but Roger on his day is probably much worse. I mean his naive thick fans still believe the BS Roger fed them at Wimby 2012, pretending to have a back injury wearing a vest, before winning the tournament :laugh:There's no doubt Federer made up this nonsense to try and take pressure of himself, including his disgraceful MTO against Malisse that he falsely apologised for.
Even during his prime Roger used to take fake MTOs to try and gain an advantage, against Safin in the Australian Open he said he had a 'back injury' Where did that disappear to :laugh
Against Canas in 2007 he was losing so took a MTO to 'retape his foot-blisters'- pathetic antics which were later copied Rafael Nadull in 2014 :laugh:And let's not forget the 'leg message' against Nalbandian in Masters 2005, he still lost though despite his cheatin :laugh:Credit to Laverfan for doing the research into Frauderer's antics of MTOs on 606v2.
So does this cheating fraud have any defenders left :laugh:Only his naive followers will still stick with this pathetic figure who is bloated by ATP and NIKE in interests of money, infact the only people who can really stand behind his disgraceful actions have... well how can I put it... a mental disability.
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
Just keep in mind what that above post is meant to be.
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
Is that your post?
Wow, lotta vitriol there.
Wow, lotta vitriol there.
luvsports!- Posts : 4718
Join date : 2012-09-28
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
Looks like the imitation was perfect then...
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
Well not if you are referring to me it isn't, far from it. For some on here much closer to the mark.
So is that your post? Few things I dispute btw
So is that your post? Few things I dispute btw
luvsports!- Posts : 4718
Join date : 2012-09-28
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
LS, of course it was not of you lol. You are certainly one of the more balanced Federer fans I have seen across forums.luvsports! wrote:Well not if you are referring to me it isn't, far from it.
Very very close to the mark, infact some would argue that Hawkeye shows it right on the mark.For some on here much closer to the mark.
WHAT DO YOU DISPUTE??? I can't believe naive Frauderer worshippers are becoming even more deluded than Nadull fan boys ROFLMAO :laugh:There's NOTHING disputable, the fact is you have to open your eyes and accept Federer is a massive cheat
So is that your post? Few things I dispute btw
^Imagine that type of reply, 24/7, with 6 posters all backing each other up and repeating the same thing.
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
I won't quote a classic Bill Withers song JS ;)but I deffo see your point!
1) I thought and still think that was pretty ott from feds. Delpo took over 10 seconds to challenge but Feds responded tactlessly and churlishly. Similar thing to when he called djoko's winner "a lucky shot".
2) I don't see too much wrong with yelling at the crowd, again heat of the moment thing, perhaps could of handled it better. Or he could of taken the djoko route by swearing in serbian at the crowd IW '11 vs rafa or ferrer firing a tennis ball at a crying baby!
3) No complaints there, ala soderling vs nadal in rome 09. Could ahve been a genuine mistake mind but if not, bad feds!
4) the link didn't work but was that when feds said to murray, "you f*****g stopped" ?? That was wrong again, but heat of the moment stuff, nobody is perfect, but yes poor form.
5) The malisse thing was proper legit, that's silly. Same again for wtf's 05. Can't say I know enough about the others.
Seriously though 3rd time. That is your post yes? It's just it wreaks of socal!
1) I thought and still think that was pretty ott from feds. Delpo took over 10 seconds to challenge but Feds responded tactlessly and churlishly. Similar thing to when he called djoko's winner "a lucky shot".
2) I don't see too much wrong with yelling at the crowd, again heat of the moment thing, perhaps could of handled it better. Or he could of taken the djoko route by swearing in serbian at the crowd IW '11 vs rafa or ferrer firing a tennis ball at a crying baby!
3) No complaints there, ala soderling vs nadal in rome 09. Could ahve been a genuine mistake mind but if not, bad feds!
4) the link didn't work but was that when feds said to murray, "you f*****g stopped" ?? That was wrong again, but heat of the moment stuff, nobody is perfect, but yes poor form.
5) The malisse thing was proper legit, that's silly. Same again for wtf's 05. Can't say I know enough about the others.
Seriously though 3rd time. That is your post yes? It's just it wreaks of socal!
luvsports!- Posts : 4718
Join date : 2012-09-28
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
You see JS I agree with the points you make of Federer. Unlike you I can see the truth.....whereas you cannot see the most important fact:
Federer is a 1000 times more talented than Nadal..while everybody sees it.
That;s the difference between Federer and Nadal fans is that we are ojective, Nadal fans aren't. As simple as that.
Federer is a 1000 times more talented than Nadal..while everybody sees it.
That;s the difference between Federer and Nadal fans is that we are ojective, Nadal fans aren't. As simple as that.
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
No tenez! See you cannot make these generalisations! It does not add credence to your theory one iota.
All of us to an extent I think keep the windscreen wipers off, but in certain things I think Amri defends rafa to the hilt more than say me, SB or tenez does.
Nothing wrong with that mind.
All of us to an extent I think keep the windscreen wipers off, but in certain things I think Amri defends rafa to the hilt more than say me, SB or tenez does.
Nothing wrong with that mind.
luvsports!- Posts : 4718
Join date : 2012-09-28
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
It is my post to imitate the Nadal haters on here, as I said.luvposrts! wrote:That is your post yes?
If you look closely I also insult Nadal when I can, so I think you can safely guess it is not my opinion
As for your analysis (of the main post), I think personally it's pretty fair, but if I so wanted I could continue to post in that manner, attacking your posts with overused smiley faces, abbreviations, tenuous links, gaps in logic etc.
Last edited by Julia Santamaria on Tue Jan 28, 2014 9:01 pm; edited 1 time in total
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
Tenez are you mocking yourself here lolFederer is a 1000 times more talented than Nadal..while everybody sees it.
That;s the difference between Federer and Nadal fans is that we are ojective, Nadal fans aren't. As simple as that.
I will assume this post is being ironic
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
^This post by you by the way is a mistruth, I have made a similar post before with the same links, and you defended Roger and said that despite getting a bit OTT Roger was 'principally right.'Tenez wrote:You see JS I agree with the points you make of Federer.
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
things happen in the hit of the moment. For me I don't mind them cause they are spontaneous. I am much less forgiving when it is a calculated move...like taking 10s to check a mark or simply take a strategic MTO. And it is a fact that it was a lucky shot from Djoko, more so a nothing-to-lose-anymore shot! even Djoko admitted it.luvsports! wrote: I won't quote a classic Bill Withers song JS ;)but I deffo see your point!
1) I thought and still think that was pretty ott from feds. Delpo took over 10 seconds to challenge but Feds responded tactlessly and churlishly. Similar thing to when he called djoko's winner "a lucky shot".
Again Fed is at the receiving end not the one starting the argument.4) the link didn't work but was that when feds said to murray, "you f*****g stopped" ?? That was wrong again, but heat of the moment stuff, nobody is perfect, but yes poor form.
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
OK here we go from 'I agree with you JS' to a full scale defence.
The funny thing is I though LS's analysis was actually correct, but it is funny to see you go back on yourself.
BTW you left our PM debate half-finished, let us see if you can debate without the knowledge that many people will come and back you up... if you have the guts!!!
The funny thing is I though LS's analysis was actually correct, but it is funny to see you go back on yourself.
BTW you left our PM debate half-finished, let us see if you can debate without the knowledge that many people will come and back you up... if you have the guts!!!
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
Julia Santamaria wrote:^This post by you by the way is a mistruth, I have made a similar post before with the same links, and you defended Roger and said that despite getting a bit OTT Roger was 'principally right.'Tenez wrote:You see JS I agree with the points you make of Federer.
Yes I defend it again here above but I can understand that Fed annoys some on many regards. I am not trying to shove Fed down the throat of those who do not like him. ...whereas you are trying to make us see Nadal the way you do....while completely refusing to consider our views one second.
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
Julia Santamaria wrote:OK here we go from 'I agree with you JS' to a full scale defence.
The funny thing is I though LS's analysis was actually correct, but it is funny to see you go back on yourself.
BTW you left our PM debate half-finished, let us see if you can debate without the knowledge that many people will come and back you up... if you have the guts!!!
It's not half finished..it's you again who do not want to see the end of it. Post it here in the open and you will see. I closed your door once again!..but opened an other one to keep arguing.
Last edited by Tenez on Tue Jan 28, 2014 9:08 pm; edited 1 time in total
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
No the difference is there are simply more people on here attacking Nadal than Federer, if it was the other way round you'd defend Fed more often, and another impression can be created.Tenez wrote:Julia Santamaria wrote:^This post by you by the way is a mistruth, I have made a similar post before with the same links, and you defended Roger and said that despite getting a bit OTT Roger was 'principally right.'Tenez wrote:You see JS I agree with the points you make of Federer.
Yes I defend it again here above but I can understand that Fed annoys some on many regards. I am not trying to shove Fed down the throat of those who do not like him. ...whereas you are trying to make us see Nadal the way you do....while completely refusing to consider our views one second.
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
not true, I was not defending Federer on v2 or anywhere else. I just try to explain his attitude which frankly has not shoked many over the last 10 years.
I can't remember heard him being booed like Nadal last Sunday for instance.
I can't remember heard him being booed like Nadal last Sunday for instance.
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
Oh please, you responded to some minor point in the article; saying which players he is more likely to take a MTO against, and I replied that there could also be a similar argument for why he would take MTOs against fitter players (giving some examples), and you had nothing to reply. Either way it was not really responding to anything, there was only one line in the whole piece indicating which type of players he would/ would not take MTOs against.Tenez wrote:
It's not half finished..it's you again who do not want to see the end of it.
You want that, so that you have 100 people defending and repeating your every line! For once debate without that, and I will keep my promise... if there is any point you have made that you feel 'trumps' my argument... I will post it out to the other 2 of you.Tenez wrote:
Post it here in the open and you will see. I closed your doors once again!
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-e-Ud-ly04Tenez wrote:
I can't remember heard him being booed like Nadal last Sunday for instance.
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
He got booed for smashing his racket in miami 09 vs djokovic.
luvsports!- Posts : 4718
Join date : 2012-09-28
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
Snap!luvsports! wrote:He got booed for smashing his racket in miami 09 vs djokovic.
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
but he is booed cause it a hot day and people were having fun. Not as a way to say "you cheat" like last Sunday!...very different.
Tenez- Posts : 21050
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
I love a bit of racquet smashing as it just shows passion, and remember that one from Fed quite well.
The crowd did boo him, and I thought, wow, will this be the first time ever that the crowd will support Nole over Fed...but no, as soon as he sat on the chair to calm down and then stood up, the crowd cheered for him again, they saw the passion and loved it as well.
Fed is no saint, but his temper outbursts more harmed him than his opponents.
The crowd did boo him, and I thought, wow, will this be the first time ever that the crowd will support Nole over Fed...but no, as soon as he sat on the chair to calm down and then stood up, the crowd cheered for him again, they saw the passion and loved it as well.
Fed is no saint, but his temper outbursts more harmed him than his opponents.
noleisthebest- Posts : 27907
Join date : 2012-06-18
Re: Decoding Amri's Jinxes: Nobody saw it coming but Nadal did, that's why he lost.
'Federer fan blames hot weather for Roger getting booed'Tenez wrote:but he is booed cause it a hot day and people were having fun.
N2D2L- Posts : 5813
Join date : 2013-05-03
Page 1 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4
Our Tennis Forum :: Tennis :: Tennis
Page 1 of 4
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Sat Mar 23, 2024 9:00 pm by noleisthebest
» The Bullshit of Rafael Nadal
Mon Feb 12, 2024 12:15 am by Daniel2
» Why Trump's 'tough' stance on radical Islam... could lead to more terrorism
Thu Feb 01, 2024 4:32 am by Daniel2
» Missing Madeline 10 years on..
Thu Feb 01, 2024 4:31 am by Daniel2
» '15 Dubious Weak Era Records'
Thu Feb 01, 2024 4:06 am by Daniel2
» AO 2024 - Sinner baby!!
Thu Feb 01, 2024 4:05 am by Daniel2
» Paris Masters
Mon Nov 06, 2023 9:47 pm by noleisthebest
» Alvarez could bring me back to tennis
Wed Sep 20, 2023 10:25 am by raiders_of_the_lost_ark
» IDEMOOOOOOO! ! ! !
Mon Sep 11, 2023 9:47 am by noleisthebest