Nadal gives 0 credit to Rosol

classy as ever with the excuses.

http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/news/tennis-rafa-happy-arrive-wimbledon-two-knees-152438765.html

Nasty piece of work. Always has been, always will be.


"You cannot forget the tennis when you have Wimbledon in two weeks. It's impossible. But I stopped for a few days," Nadal said. "This time of year in Mallorca it's great as we have a little time to enjoy the sea.
"Not playing a tournament before here always makes it a little bit tougher because you really play with the real feelings only when you are playing matches."

I don't remember Djokovic moaning about the lack of tournaments, he went on a sea-side holiday in Corsica, didn't play any competitive matches on grass, he played Boodles, just like Nadal who played another  exo tournament last week.

"My view is if I arrive to the quarter-finals is because I will be ready. But for me, it's going to be very tough to be there."

I wonder why 

He had just won the French on those same knees last year...  So what if he was taking pain killers-- all that means is he was not feeling pain..  anyone with unbiased eyes could see he was running as well as ever against Rosol.  Rosol got hot and hit him off the court. Period.

Absolutely, Rosol played a phenomenal match, fearlessly.
Let us remind ourselves of that glorious day 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8cjKxPPaMSc

Probably one of the most electric matches I've ever seen. Superb!

The fact someone in the top 100 even lost 2 sets against a cripple is an embarrassment.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/tennis/18645470

Julia Santamaria wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/tennis/18645470

That was last year sweet, after match interviews don't generally reflect what one really feels. Especially in case of Nadal. If he was really praising 'unbelievable' Rosol, why couldn't he do even now. Why did he have to look at his excuses instead?

This is what he had to say yesterday:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/tennis/23016202


"I tried my best. I don't have anything to learn from that match because it's not an excuse. Rosol played a fantastic fifth set.
"He probably would have beaten me if I was healthy."

When Federer lost to Berdych in Wimbledon 2010 I can't remember him saying Berdych was unbelievable and played a fantastic set, or that Berdych would have probably won even if Feds back was healthy.

Childish as I expect from you amritia. Nadal won't become right just because Fed was wrong too.

Don't know why you feel such urge to bring in Fed's response when the talk is about Nadal and Rosol.

Firstly I am not Amritia.

Secondly I did address the Nadal situation, I showed a link of him yesterday, where he went out of his way to clarify that Rosol played fantastic and that he would have given to Rosol given the way he was playing, even if fully fit.

Thirdly I bring up Fed to show not everyone is perfect, and continuously bringing up one person as if he's the only culprit shows a sign of irrational hatred.

Julia Santamaria wrote:When Federer lost to Berdych in Wimbledon 2010 I can't remember him saying Berdych was unbelievable and played a fantastic set, or that Berdych would have probably won even if Feds back was healthy.

True but we know Federer is honest. We are less sure of Rafa's honesty for some reasons. His shoulder bump intimidation in that match just says it all.

Nadal went out of his way to clarify that Rosol played fantastic and that he would have given to Rosol given the way he was playing, even if fully fit.

You hate Nadal.

Julia Santamaria wrote:Nadal went out of his way to clarify that Rosol played fantastic and that he would have given to Rosol given the way he was playing, even if fully fit.

You hate Nadal.

You bet you I can't stand anything about him. A complete fake in every way. The mind boggles at people like you who are infatuated with him to the extent they see themselves as his personal defenders.

Didn't you say a few days ago you didn't hate him? Perhaps you've changed your mind.

Well Rosol deserves all the credit cause Nadal was blown off the court in straight sets 

It went to 5 sets if I can recall correctly, not 3.

Julia Santamaria wrote:It went to 5 sets if I can recall correctly, not 3.

The match today was 3 sets...
Sorry Amri...Loos like Nadal is getting worse...he may not even be seeded next year,let alone be given a wildcard to compete 

Veejay wrote:

Julia Santamaria wrote:It went to 5 sets if I can recall correctly, not 3.

The match today was 3 sets...
Sorry Amri...Loos like Nadal is getting worse...he may not even be seeded next year,let alone be given a wildcard to compete 

Who is 'Amri'? A few people have called me that, not sure why.

Secondly, what has today's match got to do with Rosol getting credit. Surely Darcis should get credit?

Thirdly, Nadal has just won a history 8th French Open Title a few weeks ago, where he played a fantastic match against Djokovic. I think if he enters Wimbledon next year, he should atleast get a wildcard.

Julia Santamaria wrote:

Veejay wrote:

Julia Santamaria wrote:It went to 5 sets if I can recall correctly, not 3.

The match today was 3 sets...
Sorry Amri...Loos like Nadal is getting worse...he may not even be seeded next year,let alone be given a wildcard to compete 

Who is 'Amri'? A few people have called me that, not sure why.

Secondly, what has today's match got to do with Rosol getting credit. Surely Darcis should get credit?

Thirdly, Nadal has just won a history 8th French Open Title a few weeks ago, where he played a fantastic match against Djokovic. I think if he enters Wimbledon next year, he should atleast get a wildcard.

Amri - That you enjoy changing pseudo is fine but don't pretend you are not. We simply know and I have proof!

I have no idea what you're on about.

If you're using location tracker, then that is centralised, yesterday I checked my location when I was at home and it was the same house as you, then I went to north London to work and it was still exactly the same location (same as yours).

It is centralised I think so that anyone living in a certain city or zone just shows in the same place. Either that or I live in your house.

Julia Santamaria wrote:I have no idea what you're on about.

If you're using location tracker, then that is centralised, yesterday I checked my location when I was at home and it was the same house as you, then I went to north London to work and it was still exactly the same location (same as yours).

It is centralised I think so that anyone living in a certain city or zone just shows in the same place. Either that or I live in your house.

Amri, we have PMs here from people on v2 telling us all about your status there and warning us of your turning-up,  we certainly never ask for it or are interested in the least, so just drop the pretense and grow up once and for all

What status? Where? What are you talking about?

This is an unfortunate case of mistaken identity I'm afraid.

Julia Santamaria wrote:This is an unfortunate case of mistaken identity I'm afraid.

No amri, its not. We have known amritia for quite many years. And your style of writing, your posts and your constant defending of Nadal like a shield etc. they are all quite indicative. So unless u are an amritia clone, I don't see anything to suggest otherwise.